The Color Purple Contents
- The Color Purple: Social and political context
- Early twentieth century American business
- Early twentieth century American black education
- Colonialism and post colonialism
- The American Civil Rights movement
- The American Black Power movement
- The Women’s Liberation movement
- The Color Purple: Religious and philosophical context
- The Color Purple: Literary context
- Textual help
- Letter 1
- Letter 2
- Letter 3
- Letter 4
- Letter 5
- Letter 6
- Letter 7
- Letter 8
- Letter 9
- Letter 10
- Letter 11
- Letter 12
- Letter 13
- Letter 14
- Letter 15
- Letter 16
- Letter 17
- Letter 18
- Letter 19
- Letter 20
- Letter 21
- Letter 22
- Letter 23
- Letter 24
- Letter 25
- Letter 26
- Letter 27
- Letter 28
- Letter 29
- Letter 30
- Letter 31
- Letter 32
- Letter 33
- Letter 34
- Letter 35
- Letter 36
- Letter 37
- Letter 38
- Letter 39
- Letter 40
- Letter 41
- Letter 42
- Letter 43
- Letter 44
- Letter 45
- Letter 46
- Letter 47
- Letter 48
- Letter 49
- Letter 50
- Letter 51
- Letter 52
- Letter 53
- Letter 54
- Letter 55
- Letter 56
- Letter 57
- Letter 58
- Letter 59
- Letter 60
- Letter 61
- Letter 62
- Letter 63
- Letter 64
- Letter 65
- Letter 66
- Letter 67
- Letter 68
- Letter 69
- Letter 70
- Letter 71
- Letter 72
- Letter 73
- Letter 74
- Letter 75
- Letter 76
- Letter 77
- Letter 78
- Letter 79
- Letter 80
- Letter 81
- Letter 82
- Letter 83
- Letter 84
- Letter 85
- Letter 86
- Letter 87
- Letter 88
- Letter 89
- Letter 90
The impact of the American Civil War (1861-1865)
Divisions, tensions and contradictions
The American Civil War was an armed conflict between the northern and southern states of America. Although it is often seen as a war that was fought on the part of the North to end slavery and on the part of the South to preserve it, the causes were much more complex in terms of the deep rooted divisions that existed between the outlooks and values of the rural South and the industrial northern states.
The South was an agricultural region where cotton and tobacco were the main sources of the region’s economic strength. The area relied on exports to markets in Western Europe and white southern society had a rigid class structure, built on a well-established Christian patriarchal model.
The local plantation owner was a ‘king’ within his own area and a network of senior families controlled the economic, political and legal business of ‘their’ state, maintaining stability by means of the wealth that they gained from using slave labour on their agricultural plantations. Slavery was seen by white landowners as a cost-effective way of running large plantations and many other white business people would have recognised how important the local plantation owner was to their own prosperity and well-being.
Not only was slavery simply accepted as part of the southern way of life but many people believed that it was justified in the Bible.
How the Bible was used to justify slavery - the curse of Ham
The primary Christian justification of the use of African slaves was based on a story from the Old Testament book of Genesis, which recounts the story of a curse which was laid on Noah’s son, Ham. It then passed on to Ham’s son, Canaan and his descendants, who were all condemned to become the lowest of slaves. (See Genesis 9:18-27.) According to legend, Canaan then settled in Africa, so the dark skin of Africans became associated with the ‘Curse of Ham’. Thus the enslavement of Africans was justified through Old Testament teaching.
In contrast to the agricultural South, northern states were quickly industrialised and social mobility was much more evident in northern towns and cities. Rigid social divisions were not so evident and most successful entrepreneurs based their business interests in the North.
The North was also cosmopolitan, with a wide mixture of nationalities and religions. The pace of life was faster and this also contributed to the pace of change. The Federal government was based in Washington DC and political control of the South was perceived as being dictated by northern interests.
There were many abolitionist groups in the North working to abolish slavery throughout the Union. Other northerners were ambivalent, recognising that northern prosperity was based on the input of poorly paid immigrant workers who were not slaves, but lived lives that were very harsh.
In the South there was also an increasing belief that the government would try to impose northern values on the South by attempting to interfere with the so-called ‘peculiar (meaning ‘unique to’) institution’ of slavery.
The issue of how much power any state had, compared to federal authority, eventually became mixed up with the rights of states to own slaves or the desire of other states to abolish the institution of slavery. Expansion into the West of America by settlers from Europe also created tension, when newly created states wished to join the Union and decisions had to be made by the government as to whether or not slavery in new states should or should not be permitted.
‘Bleeding Kansas’ (1854) - The first slave-free state
Kansas was opened to settlement in 1854 and the huge number of new inhabitants was almost equally split between those who supported slavery and those who opposed it. Violent clashes occurred over the issue and the state was nicknamed ‘Bleeding Kansas’ as a result.
When Kansas was admitted to the Union as a slave-free state at the beginning of 1861, political tension between the North and South had become serious. Many people in the traditional southern slave states saw the Kansas decision as the Union’s first step towards abolishing slavery throughout the Union. This, they believed, would lead to the destruction of the southern way of life.
Secession of South Carolina (1860)
South Carolina was the first state to leave the Union at the end of 1860 feeling that it could not continue to be part of a federal government that was determined to impose northern views on the South. This pushed other southern states into doing the same.
The first seven seceding states set up a provisional government at Montgomery, Alabama. After hostilities began at Fort Sumter in Charleston Harbour on April 12, 1861, the border states of Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee and North Carolina joined the new government, which then moved its capital to Richmond, Virginia.
The Union was thus divided approximately on geographic lines. Twenty-one northern and Border States, kept the title of the United States and the eleven pro slavery states named themselves the Confederate States of America.
How religion was used to justify the war
Religion was a central justification for the American Civil War on both sides:
- Both North and South believed that God was fighting for its own army
- Many ministers, generals, leaders and newspaper editors went so far as to proclaim that God had ordained the war and would determine its length, its damages, and its outcome
- Leaders in the North and the South proclaimed themselves as God’s ‘chosen people'
- Leaders of the Southern Confederate government took Deo Vindice (God will vindicate) as their official motto
- Southern newspapers criticised the northern government as ‘godless’ and declared the southern cause to be under the ‘favour and guidance of God’
- Almost three-quarters of all published sermons on both sides declared the war to be ‘holy’.
Religion and slavery in the war
- Abolitionists, mainly in the northern states, saw the emancipation of slaves as a sacred duty imposed by God
- In general, the northern states held to a conviction that special status for the whole country in the eyes of God could only be gained by the creation of a single Union
- Southern preachers declared that slavery was a sacred trust and that the institution had not been initiated by the South, but imposed on the South by the slave traders of Great Britain and the northern states
- Others argued that because God had commissioned the South to be a Christian nation, then victory depended on winning God’s favour. The war would be lost if the slaves were ill-treated or won if they were treated in a humanitarian way
- Some Southern educators began to talk for the first time about educating black people and Baptist ministers, especially, tried to persuade their white congregations to work politically toward repealing laws that prohibited slave literacy.
- Slaves had their own preachers as well as their own secret religious gatherings
- Black preachers were often highly literate and used the language and ethos of the Old Testament to create powerful messages about redemption, freedom and divine retribution against white masters
- Slave religion emphasized that God would punish the cruelty of the slave holders and end the sufferings of slaves on earth
- The belief that God was on the side of the slaves gave them courage to run away to find the northern army, or to follow the Underground Railroad with its risks and dangers to what they believed would be a new life of freedom
- Religious beliefs were expressed through spirituals that expressed pain, sorrow and resignation as well as hope, joy and rebellion.
For the white South, religious belief was important in the Civil War because it reinforced the idea that the people had been called to fight as a sacred duty to God, thus making the nation stronger through Christian sacrifice and faith.
For the black South, religion formed a rallying point for freedom fighters and the cause of equality. It empowered African-Americans with a cultural and shared language that would in future years help them to enter leadership, civil rights, the arts and education.
In the North, Christian ideals of justice, equality and freedom for mankind under a Christian God fuelled the abolitionist cause and also reinforced Thomas Jefferson’s original 1776 declaration of American independence:
(However, it must also be noted that Jefferson was a slave owner and his other writings and actions seem to suggest that by ‘all men’ he meant all free, white, property-owning males.)
The American Civil War was the most destructive conflict the country had ever experienced. Hostilities continued until the total defeat of the Confederacy in 1865. Ironically, all who were involved, black or white, justified their actions by the use of Christian rhetoric throughout the conflict.
- English Standard Version
- King James Version
The Creation; Fall of humankind and universal or original sin; Noah and the Flood; the call of Abraham (start of salvation history), followed by the stories of the other patriarchs, Isaac, Jacob and Joseph.
Famous stories from the Bible: Adam and Eve / Creation; Noah's Ark; Abraham
Scan and go
Scan on your mobile for direct link.